From 8add0012b9c1c61e5c4108443fcb9d16978318f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Melody Horn Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 11:34:43 -0700 Subject: fix more list issues --- _posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to '_posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md') diff --git a/_posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md b/_posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md index e9ab8be..aaaa954 100644 --- a/_posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md +++ b/_posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md @@ -150,12 +150,12 @@ if you're curious, you can take a look at [the source for our druid example](htt so apparently druid is actually pretty darn usable. i only have a couple tiny issues with it: -1. it doesn't use platform native UI widgets, so it doesn't look quite like a windows app should, and it won't look quite like a mac or linux app should either if i test it there. -this one is a feature as far as some people are concerned, but i am not on that list. +1. it doesn't use platform native UI widgets, so it doesn't look quite like a windows app should, and it won't look quite like a mac or linux app should either if i test it there. + this one is a feature as far as some people are concerned, but i am not on that list. 2. accessibility features like being able to tab between UI widgets are missing, so you'd have to roll those yourself in a real application. -maybe they'll add that by default in future versions, maybe not, but it would be neat if it existed. -3. high-level documentation is incomplete. -the individual struct/function docs are really good, but at a high level you don't really have a convenient place to jump in. + maybe they'll add that by default in future versions, maybe not, but it would be neat if it existed. +3. high-level documentation is incomplete. + the individual struct/function docs are really good, but at a high level you don't really have a convenient place to jump in. i was about to add "no support for web" to that list, but even though the high-level docs don't mention it, the crate root docs and the examples do. on the plus side, it just works, and i didn't have to make any changes to my code because i use [this patch to wasm-pack that lets you just use binary crates in wasm-pack](https://github.com/rustwasm/wasm-pack/pull/736) even though it hasn't been merged yet upstream. -- cgit v1.2.3