From 09d5c19296d6a1c7e58f995c5647500720b0a8e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Melody Horn Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:13:14 -0600 Subject: translate C comparison to .rst --- vs-c.rst | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) create mode 100644 vs-c.rst (limited to 'vs-c.rst') diff --git a/vs-c.rst b/vs-c.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..346f6f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/vs-c.rst @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +*************** +Comparison to C +*************** + +What differentiates Crowbar from C? + +Removals +======== + +Some of the footguns and complexity in C come from misfeatures that can simply not be used. + +Footguns +-------- + +Some constructs in C are almost always the wrong thing. + +* ``goto`` +* Hexadecimal float literals +* Wide characters +* Digraphs +* Prefix ``++`` and ``--`` +* Chaining mixed left and right shifts (e.g. ``x << 3 >> 2``) +* Chaining relational/equality operators (e.g. ``3 < x == 2``) +* Mixed chains of bitwise or logical operators (e.g. ``2 & x && 4 ^ y``) +* The comma operator ``,`` + +Some constructs in C exhibit implicit behavior that should instead be made explicit. + +* ``typedef`` +* Octal escape sequences +* Using an assignment operator (``=``, ``+=``, etc) or (postfix) ``++`` and ``--`` as components in a larger expression +* The conditional operator ``?:`` +* Preprocessor macros (but constants are fine) + +Needless Complexity +------------------- + +Some type modifiers in C exist solely for the purpose of enabling optimizations which most compilers can do already. + +* ``inline`` +* ``register`` + +Some type modifiers in C only apply in very specific circumstances and so aren't important. + +* ``restrict`` +* ``volatile`` +* ``_Imaginary`` + +Adjustments +=========== + +Some C features are footguns by default, so Crowbar ensures that they are only used correctly. + +* Unions are not robust by default. + Crowbar only supports unions when they are :doc:`tagged-unions` (or declared and used with the ``fragile`` keyword). + +C's syntax isn't perfect, but it's usually pretty good. +However, sometimes it just sucks, and in those cases Crowbar makes changes. + +* C's variable declaration syntax is far from intuitive in nontrivial cases (function pointers, pointer-to-``const`` vs ``const``-pointer, etc). + Crowbar uses :doc:`simplified type syntax ` to keep types and variable names distinct. +* ``_Bool`` is just ``bool``, ``_Complex`` is just ``complex`` (why drag the preprocessor into it?) +* Adding a ``_`` to numeric literals as a separator +* All string literals, char literals, etc are UTF-8 +* Octal literals have a ``0o`` prefix (never ``0O`` because that looks nasty) + +Additions +========= + +Anti-Footguns +------------- + +* C is generous with memory in ways that are unreliable by default. + Crowbar adds :doc:`memory safety conventions ` to make correctness the default behavior. +* C's conventions for error handling are unreliable by default. + Crowbar adds :doc:`error propagation ` to make correctness the default behavior. + +Trivial Room For Improvement +---------------------------- + +* Binary literals, prefixed with ``0b``/``0B`` -- cgit v1.2.3