aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/_posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '_posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md')
-rw-r--r--_posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md10
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/_posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md b/_posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md
index e9ab8be..aaaa954 100644
--- a/_posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md
+++ b/_posts/2020-08-21-survey-of-rust-gui-libraries.md
@@ -150,12 +150,12 @@ if you're curious, you can take a look at [the source for our druid example](htt
so apparently druid is actually pretty darn usable.
i only have a couple tiny issues with it:
-1. it doesn't use platform native UI widgets, so it doesn't look quite like a windows app should, and it won't look quite like a mac or linux app should either if i test it there.
-this one is a feature as far as some people are concerned, but i am not on that list.
+1. it doesn't use platform native UI widgets, so it doesn't look quite like a windows app should, and it won't look quite like a mac or linux app should either if i test it there.
+ this one is a feature as far as some people are concerned, but i am not on that list.
2. accessibility features like being able to tab between UI widgets are missing, so you'd have to roll those yourself in a real application.
-maybe they'll add that by default in future versions, maybe not, but it would be neat if it existed.
-3. high-level documentation is incomplete.
-the individual struct/function docs are really good, but at a high level you don't really have a convenient place to jump in.
+ maybe they'll add that by default in future versions, maybe not, but it would be neat if it existed.
+3. high-level documentation is incomplete.
+ the individual struct/function docs are really good, but at a high level you don't really have a convenient place to jump in.
i was about to add "no support for web" to that list, but even though the high-level docs don't mention it, the crate root docs and the examples do.
on the plus side, it just works, and i didn't have to make any changes to my code because i use [this patch to wasm-pack that lets you just use binary crates in wasm-pack](https://github.com/rustwasm/wasm-pack/pull/736) even though it hasn't been merged yet upstream.